Tag: USWNT

Women’s Soccer is Too Conservative

Posted on by Backline Soccer

Women’s soccer is politically progressive, but conservative in almost every other respect. It’s time to embrace the future.

The biggest cultural moment for women’s soccer in American history happened this summer, surpassing even the famous 1999 World Cup victory on home soil. And the defining player of the moment, Megan Rapinoe, is also famously outspoken and forthright about politics. She is an out lesbian who has kneeled in solidarity about racial injustice, and been the subject of personal attacks from Donald Trump. She has seized her fame and used it as a vehicle to speak about important political causes.

And it’s not just Rapinoe.

Her USWNT teammates Ashlyn Harris and Ali Krieger married this year to much fanfare. Both have been unafraid to voice their opinions on contentious topics. The entire US team unabashedly celebrated their record goal-scoring output during the World Cup and then celebrated with some friendly drunken debauchery once they came home, inspiring an important conversation about expectations placed on women compared to men.

The women’s soccer fandom too is diverse, and organized around political causes. They support labor, queer rights, racial justice, and gender equality. They put their money and time into these causes, and challenge their own teams when they fail to live up to those expectations.

But in spite of all that, women’s soccer in this country remains fundamentally conservative in many respects. That’s not always a bad thing, but it’s worth interrogating why a community that’s so open to progressive values in other areas is so parochial in others.

Teams are conservative in their marketing

For three decades, women’s soccer has been sold as ‘family-friendly’ and targeted primarily at young girls. The tide is starting to turn on this, with teams slowly starting to realize that people in their 20s and 30s—with time, disposable income, and the desire to drink alcohol—are a prime sports market. But why did it take so long, and why are many teams still focused on families first?

Answer: because it’s safe.

It’s safe, in the first place, because it’s a time-tested strategy. You won’t become the next Portland Thorns by running the same ‘little girls’ marketing campaigns as everyone else, but you also probably won’t have anything blow up in your face. It’s also safe in the sense that it avoids ruffling any feathers. No one gets upset when young girls come to games. But some people will get upset if you cultivate a rowdy environment. And god forbid there’s heckling or any kind of harsh words.

Or consider the consistent under-investment in merchandise. Stories were rampant during the World Cup of fans who were desperate to buy shirts but simply couldn’t find a dealer able to sell them.  Or all the fans at the World Cup hoping for something to commemorate the experience but unable to get anything because of winding lines at the few available locations.

In all these cases, conservatism about the potential value of the market resulted in significant lost sales, and a worse experience for fans. It’s safe to market to young girls, but it produces a less energetic experience for fans who want to experience the agony and ecstasy of sporting endeavor. It also does a disservice to the athletes themselves to treat them primarily as role models, rather than peak competitors in the world’s most popular sport. And at the margins, it’s actually alienating. For progressive fans, for people who don’t fit the family model, it can be dispiriting to attend events that feel like they weren’t designed for you. 

There’s nothing wrong with families, and I’m all for young girls (and boys!!) coming to games. But the sport is much more than that, and should be treated as such. 

Ownership is conservative in their investments

That basic conservatism in operations goes up to the top. After two failed leagues, the current ownership group (and US Soccer as a controlling partner) have been understandably worried about over-leveraging their stakes. They’ve imposed a strict salary cap and severe limitations on what amenities can be provided to players. They’ve held back on imposing demands for higher standards, for fear that it will drive teams out of business.

None of this has been an obvious mistake. The NWSL, after all, has survived longer than the two previous leagues combined, and appears to be on an upward trajectory. The recent changes to compensation structures announced this offseason are the clearest sign that the league is ready to transition to its next, more free-wheeling stage. There’s also strong indications that the league will soon sever its direct connections with US Soccer, which should provide more opportunity for the owners to put their feet on the accelerator.

In this case, slow-and-steady may indeed have won the race.

But there’s also a risk of overlearning the right lessons, or of overcommitting to a good premise. There were good reasons to be cautious about overspending. But it’s also true that investment is the only way to kickstart exponential growth. The NWSL was almost certainly the best league in the world for overall quality of competition over the past decade. But big European teams are (finally) starting to truly invest in their women’s teams. And there has been significant bottom-up action as well. We’ve seen the English league fully professionalize in recent years. The Italian league is in that process right now. The Spanish players recently engaged in collective action to force better conditions in their league.

There are still plenty of reasons to regard the NWSL as the best league in the world. Its average attendances dwarf the other top leagues. It has far higher parity, with genuine quality from top to bottom. It boasts a solid array of international talent, combined with (by far) the deepest national pool of players. The US college soccer infrastructure continues to draw international talent, and funnels players into US clubs.

But there are also growing reasons to doubt each of those premises. Few of the true top internationals play US college soccer, and those who do generally prefer to take their talents to Europe after graduation. Parity is growing in other leagues as they improve their compensation models.

The recent compensation changes in the NWSL—especially the allocation spending—is an important step. It gives NWSL clubs the chance to genuinely compete for big name internationals. But we have yet to see any of this money actually used. Maybe it’s just a matter of waiting for the international window to open, for expansion questions to get settled, for the draft to conclude. But it’s at least still an open question whether the teams will utilize the new opportunity to fight for global market share.

Caution is important. But there’s also a time and place for bold moves. There’s a risk that the league is missing out on its potential first-mover advantage by dithering.

The league has a deeply conservative communication strategy

Long-time fans of the NWSL are familiar with its many PR disasters. Games played on tiny baseball fields, teams folding immediately after the draft, horrible conditions for players, failed media endeavors, low-quality streams, preposterous Best XI lists, players collapsing from heatstroke, the FURT situation, and so forth. Some of this is inevitable. A small, developing league with a tiny front office infrastructure is simply not going to be able to anticipate and resolve issues before they arise.

So the question isn’t whether the league will make mistakes; it’s whether they respond to those mistakes productively. On that front, it’s mostly been a dismal failure. In case after case, they have opted for secrecy and obfuscation. Rather than acknowledging the issue, explaining what went wrong, and outlining plans for improvement, we generally get radio silence.

It’s a deeply conservative model of damage response, focused entirely on limiting exposure to risk, rather than seeking to build positive change. It follows the old hierarchical model of sports consumption, where teams supply material to passive fans. Which puts it very much at odds with the sort of collaborative/collective model of participation that many fans desire. 

Fans are conservative in their approach to the game

It’s not just the clubs that are conservative, though. It’s also the fans. For as much as women’s soccer fandom embraces progress at the social level, they’re resistant when it comes to the game of soccer itself.

Consider the uproar when teams experiment even mildly with tactics. Women’s soccer fandom is deeply skeptical of a back three, and heaven help us if teams try anything more innovative—even if these are extremely common and successful models for men’s teams around the world. Fans are often skeptical of innovations in league structure or team organization. There’s not much apparent appetite for advanced statistics. And so on.

None of this is particularly surprising. Sports fandom is notably conservative in almost every field. It took decades to drag baseball fans—kicking and screaming the whole way—to some limited acceptance of sabermetrics. Men’s soccer fans in Europe spent similar decades insisting that ‘the way we’ve always done it’ was the only viable way to ever do it. But something doesn’t have to be surprising to be lamentable.

Women’s soccer fans are far more comfortable with difference than most sports fans. They are familiar with the value of innovation in other areas. It would be nice to see that comfort reflected more often within the structures of soccer.

Conservatism in investments is often wise, but it can go too far

You can make a case for all of the conservative impulses I’ve outlined here. Women’s soccer has historically been a rocky investment, and the NWSL has succeeded in part because of its caution. It’s also relatively young. After decades, even centuries, of terminal neglect, the women’s game has none of the institutional learning that sustains things on the men’s side. If tactics are immature, if fandom is unaccustomed to demanding higher levels of innovation, there are good reasons for it.

But we shouldn’t take all of these things as given. One of the core strengths of the women’s game is its freedom from the stultifying traditions that enframe men’s sports. It’s time to start leaning more into that strength.

That doesn’t mean throwing caution to the wind and inviting new Dan Borislows to the league. It doesn’t mean spending millions to get Ada Hegerberg or Pernille Harder. But teams should be more willing to take reasonable risks. They should be thinking more about how to grow their brands tenfold, rather than worrying about how to maintain the status quo. And fans should be demanding innovation and improvement. 

This is a great thing, and it would be a huge shame to lose it to a bad gamble. But it would also be a shame to see it stagnate when it could soar. It’s time to start tipping the balance a bit more in the direction of exploration.

Red Card, Ref!

Posted on by Backline Soccer

It’s no secret or surprise that the only aspect of the NWSL that seems to bond all fans is the quality of refereeing. Or lack thereof.

Since 2015 fans have been consistently lamenting and bemoaning the quality of refereeing in the league and how it seems to get worse every year. There have been some questionable non-calls and some downright incorrect ones. One of them being when Utah Royals goalkeeper Nicole Barnhart kicked Orlando Pride striker Claire Emslie in the stomach, denying her an obvious shot on goal, and Emslie was the one who received the yellow card. Granted nobody likes the referee when a call goes against their team, as Utah fans can attest regarding defender Becky Sauerbrunn and the imprint of the ball she wore on her cheek for a while. However, the pool of referees seems to be getting smaller, leaving the ones that fans know and most certainly do not like.

The two major complaints that all fans seem to agree on are the perceived inexperience and inconsistency of all referees in the NWSL. While it’s easy to rip on the referees when they make a call fans don’t like and their team ends up losing because of it, there is a deeper problem that lies at the heart of this and it’s something that fans won’t like but will need to accept: referees are only human and are only as good as the organization they work for.

The first complaint I’ll tackle is the perception that referees in the NWSL don’t have all the experience they need to do their job properly. The training to become an official referee is not an easy one. US Soccer recently made changes to the referee program in June of this year, merging some of the levels, or grades together. The first grade is the grassroots, which is typically for the little kids/youth games. Next grade is regional, where the candidate gets their training and experience from a minimum of 50 adult amateur matches. The grade after regional is national. This is where they begin their training at US Soccer national camps and must have assistant referee experience as well. Once the person has been certified as a national referee, the dream is making PRO and FIFA grades. Once they’ve reached PRO, the next step is the NWSL, then MLS, then national team games. It is very time consuming since in order to move to the next grade and be certified nationally, the candidate must log in a lot of miles, which calls for a lot of free time to work enough matches and tournaments so they can continue to advance.

Ian Knighton is a referee that was gracious enough to give insight to what it takes to become a referee. “I think that the whole system is trying to gear towards bringing people through that are better prepared, but it’s just a few years behind. It’s a hard system to work through for most people, so you really have to narrow in on people who have the flexibility in their life to do it.”

Everyone has a side hustle that they really enjoy. More often than not, referees have day jobs or at least one other job that pays the bills. Spending all their free time working matches to climb the ladder to do NWSL games is no joke, but it can turn into one when the referee that has worked so hard makes every call incorrectly on the field. Just because you’re passionate about something doesn’t mean you’re good at it.

Which leads to the main issue NWSL fans have with referees: Inconsistency, with a capital “I.” Perhaps the best example of fans’ long-term frustration with inconsistency is the parallel situation of Lindsey Horan and Shea Groom. Groom had a particular thought about Horan’s yellow card and tweeted out on September 6th “I distinctly remember getting a red card for shoving…#NationalTeamImmunity.”

Let’s travel back in time to July 2017 to an FCKC vs. Sky Blue game. Things got a little saucy between these two teams, coming to a head in stoppage time of the first half. Sky Blue’s Erica Skroski loses the ball to FCKC’s Shea Groom and decides to show her displeasure by grabbing a hold of Groom’s jersey. Of course, nobody likes being choked by their collar, so Groom swings an arm back, trying to dislodge her. Once Skroski lets go, Groom turns and raises both arms to shove her in the neck/face area, letting Skroski know that she is not the one. Skroski was shown a yellow card for a dangerous foul and Groom was shown a straight red card for violent conduct. FCKC would not only lose the game to a Sam Kerr hat trick, but head coach Vlatko Andonovski would be fined for his comments about the officiating that saw his team go down to 10 men. “This league has some very good referees, but some of the referees are the worst in the whole world. And, unfortunately, if we want this league to go forward, if we want good players to come [to] this league…something needs to happen.” Now those were super bold words for 2017, and, some would say, a prediction for the future.

Fast forward to the Portland Thorns vs. Utah Royals game this September. In the 77thminute, after being on a yellow card for a foul against Christen Press, Emily Sonnett brought down Amy Rodriguez. The Portland defender was given a red card and received quite the unnecessary ass chewing from Rodriguez that I’m sure she will never forget. In the 80thminute Lindsey Horan, who took great offense at the treatment of her best friend and was dead set on defending her honor, shoved Rodriguez off the ball from behind. She capped her action off by spreading her arms wide open and stating “You wanna fight?” What should have been a straight red was merely a yellow card for the national team midfielder.

There are arguments that since it was the first offense for Horan, it was only a yellow card. Groom’s red was undoubtedly earned. She had both of her hands up in the face/neck area of Skroski’s face and pushed her hard enough to upset her balance. However, in Horan’s case the play had been called dead, the ball wasn’t moving, and it was clearly done out of pure spite. It’s easy to categorize Groom’s actions as violent but not so with Horan’s.  

Those two instances, out of the MANY over the past 7 years, have cemented the legacy of inconsistency among NWSL referees and honestly, it’s hard to dispute. PRO pride themselves on their extensive training, and yet none of their referees ever seem to be on the same page when it comes to calling, well…anything. In an Orlando/Houston game earlier this August the Pride lost 1-0 on a controversial PK call. Later on it was reported that the NWSL front office admitted to Orlando head coach Marc Skinner that the foul shouldn’t “have resulted in a penalty kick.” There is also the separate issue of violence that seems to be becoming more overt as referees lose more and more control over players, but that is a separate article.

It’s long been rumored that the NWSL is a training ground for referees who want to make it to the MLS level, something that Portland head coach Mark Parsons seems to believe himself when he was quoted saying, “the NWSL is a training ground for referees.” If – and that’s a big if – that is true, it’s just one more way that shows how low the women’s game is treated in America. Or it could simply be a continuous case of human error. “You get inconsistency across all referees. Just depends on experience and perspective”, says Knighton. “When you have referees with different external influences, that can create a lot of differing opinions on calls.”

So where does that leave the fans and players suffering through those differing opinions? Right where they started – nowhere. Accepting that it may take more drastic measures for refereeing to get better is a fact of life. MLS referees are barely any better and the same issues happen across the pond. And before you lot all scream “VAR!”, that’s just putting a band-aid over a bullet hole instead of stitching the wound closed. You still have the issue of human error when it comes to VAR, opening the door for even more complaints from everyone and their mom. Putting more resources into proper training would go a long way into changing the legacy of PRO.

But what about the right calls that fans and players just don’t like? Suck it up, buttercup. Knighton recommends encouraging education and dialogue. “There’s only so much you can do, but it helps to look at things from the physical position of a referee in time and space without the aids of a replay camera. It’s very easy to call a game on TV and the more people have experience or empathy for what it’s like to try and make those calls at a full sprint after 90 minutes.”

I’m not a fan of PRO at all, but I do think it’s important to recognize and embrace that some things are just a fact of life and that includes suspect refereeing at all levels of the sport. Perhaps things will get better and perhaps they won’t. But as fans, and ever as reporters, we can try and have a little more grace towards the referees who are doing their best. As Knighton says “it’s really just a change of perspective in the narrative.”

Arsenal Blocks U.S. From Speaking with Montemurro

Posted on by Backline Soccer

The United States Women’s National Team is undergoing the unenviable task of replacing two-time World Cup winner Jill Ellis and are being blocked from speaking to one of their top candidates, Arsenal Women’s head coach Joe Montemurro, according to ESPN.

The 50-year-old Australian coach has elevated the North London club to the league title in the 2018-19 campaign and has expressed interest in taking over the top ranked national team in the world. However, the club are not willing to part with the coach as they look to solidify their dominance in the FA Women’s Super League.

Ellis, the U.S. national team’s current coach, is finishing up her tenure with a Victory Tour which has seen the club playing a series of friendlies around the country to capitalize on the success of the World Cup. US Soccer would love to have the vacant role filled before she departs and Montemurro is high on the list of possibilities. 

The other aspect is the current state of the FA Women’s Super League in England. Currently the league is the only fully professional women’s football league in Europe and has attempted to capitalize on the World Cup success in a similar fashion to the United States. With the promotion of Manchester United, most of the major men’s clubs are not represented on the women’s side and ready to make waves at the club level. Holding on to Montemurro is perhaps key to that success.

Arsenal won their first three games over Manchester United, Brighton & Hove Albion and West Ham United. They have also defeated Fiorentina in Champions League Round of 32 and are the favorite in nearly every competition they face this season.

Kristen Hamilton Is Not Throwing Away Her Shot

Posted on by Backline Soccer

Not many people have quite the auspicious start to their professional career like Hamilton. Orphaned as a child in the Caribbean – wait wrong Hamilton.

Let me start over.

Her name is Kristen Hamilton and just like her team, she’s lean, mean with high esteem.

Hamilton was a star forward at University of Denver, starting almost every game. She earned a number of accolades, including NSCAA First Team All-American, Summit League Offensive Player of the Year and a MAC Hermann Semifinalist. She left Denver as the all-time leader in goals with a staggering 51. She entered the 2014 NWSL draft and was picked dead last by the Flash, but you know what they say.

In New York, you can be a new woman.

Hamilton didn’t have the smooth start to her professional career that she hoped. In a preseason game in March, she tore her ACL and MCL, beginning the first of a series of setbacks. Tearing your ACL is almost every athlete’s worse nightmare. You can either make a full recovery or fall short and have to make some serious decisions you weren’t prepared for. In interview given to the YouTube channel ‘theACLclub’ in 2016, Hamilton talks about her injury and what her recovery process was like, mentioning how the hardest part was not being able to walk six weeks before and after her surgery.

In the eye of a hurricane, there is quiet. And in that quiet, Hamilton found the strength to go through her recovery, trusting the process and her faith in God. She made a full recovery, impressing Flash Head Coach Aaran Lines, who was all too happy to have Hamilton back on the squad. She would come on as a sub in extra time during the 2016 NWSL Championship and exit as a Champion.

Hard work and determination – they get the job done.

After working her back up to full fitness and biding her time on the bench, Hamilton would get her first start in June 2017 against the Boston Breaker. With both Lynn Williams and Jess McDonald out due to injury, new head coach Paul Riley had to pick a new right-hand man. Looking over his bench, thinking to himself he needed someone who would know what to do in the trench, someone who had such resilience and would match his tactical brilliance. And who better…. than Kristen Hamilton.

Hamilton stepped onto the pitch and scored a brace within 13 minutes. The first of many. Though she would continue to be a super sub, she would get another chance and replace the injured Debinha in the 2017 NWSL Semifinal game. She earned the start for the following Championship game before facing yet another setback in the form of an injury in the 39thminute. It was reported to be an MCL tear, something she know had experience in.

Playing her way out of her injury, Hamilton would have a quiet 2018, starting 8 games and super subbing for 15. She would sub on in the second of the NWSL final, gaining another Championship ring.

But in 2019, Kristen Hamilton would finally rise above her station. With the World Cup about to begin, she wouldn’t take a break or say no to this. Knowing that Jess McDonald would be gone, and Williams needed a strike partner, Hamilton was not throwing away her shot.

June would prove to be HER month as she piled the pain on the Orlando Pride and scored her first hat trick. Even though it hurt to watch Hamilton dismantle my team single handily, it was hard to deny how beautiful her goals were. A month later in July, Hamilton tied an NWSL record and scored four goals against the Houston Dash.

Man, the woman is nonstop.

As the World Cup raged on, Kristen Hamilton began collecting NWSL awards, winning Player of the Week three games in seven games. At the end of July, she was named Player of the Month after the way she destroyed Houston’s will to live and scored a breathtaking half volley against Utah.

Hamilton is now a powerhouse player in her own right, showing the world just who is she and overcoming injury after injury. As it stands right now, Hamilton has 8 goals, 3 assists and 17 shots on goal.

And now, a very well deserved spot on the senior squad for their friendly against Portugal. Granted it is only because of injuries, but even still… history now has its eye on her. 

Hamilton is truly a dynamic player to watch. The way she’s able to get behind any backline, outplay any defender and stay with the ball is a site to behold. Hamilton is one of those rare players who actually stay with a play and find a way to score, when some other forwards to give up. And not only can she score, but she’s a team player in every sense of the word, setting her teammates up and creating chance after chance to secure the win.

Kristen Hamilton may not have had the greatest start as a professional soccer player, but she never backed down, she took her time and believe it or not, there’s a million things she hasn’t done.

Just you wait  

The Fans of Women’s Soccer: the Diehard, the Casual and the Social

Posted on by Backline Soccer

I spend a lot of time thinking about women’s soccer. It’s part of the job when you are someone who writes about women’s soccer.

I think about fans and the community around women’s soccer a lot too. It’s a community that is as diverse as it is dedicated. As adaptable as it is aggressive in its willingness to proselytize the good world of women’s soccer.

Women’s soccer and its fans have struggled during modern history due to a delightfully toxic mix of negligence from those charged with growing the game and being ignored by those who have the ability to invest in the teams that make up different leagues around the world or national teams. To be very clear the game has not struggled because the players are poor at playing soccer or because people have an inherent disinterest in women’s sports.

Fans have been pushed off and pushed away because of lack of access or lack of care taken with treating them with any kind of respect. And the ones who have survived that shuttering of fans have been left with the memory of a bitter taste in their mouth.

There are flavors of fan in women’s soccer like there are for just about any sport. We talk often in the extremes when it comes to fans or we talk about the most passionate fans without talking about the others. We hold up and praise the diehards, we often bash the casual fans for not being diehards and we disparage the social media fans as not being good enough.

When we talk about women’s soccer fans as a whole we talk about how they are rabid. Ever hungry for more. More access to games, more access to merchandise, more access to the sport they love, more devoted to the players whose jerseys they wear – if and when they can find them, and if they come in their size – on their backs.  And honestly all women’s soccer fans share a hunger for more. Because over and over we have seen if you give women’s soccer fans even an inch they will pay you for the suggestion and one day there will be a foot. And, if you give them a foot, they will prepay for the full mile for themselves and all of their friends. They will fly across the world for the national teams they love, they will spend hours on public transport getting to games, they will go above and beyond for the sport and the players.

But there are limits. The very first pro women’s soccer game played in the US after the USWNT played in and won the World Cup in France saw just over 1,800 fans show up. And while the two-win Sky Blue FC and the somewhat boring Utah Royals FC are not the marquee showpieces for the league right now, it does sum up the limits of the fan base. A fan base that cares about the quality of organizations, and has a long memory when they have been mistreated or forsaken. But they also have an endless willingness to forgive, to show up, to support teams and players if just the bare minimum is shown in terms of effort.

If you boil the fans of women’s soccer down as far as you can get you can find three general forms left. The diehards are the type that can tell you who scored in the third place game for the USWNT back in 1995 or the play leading up to Tobin Heath’s free kick in the 2013 NWSL Championship game. The casuals usually can tell you the current happenings in the sport, but may stumble on the history or push the sport aside as life gets in the way. The social fan – nope, I refuse to use “stan” here even if you are all thinking it – says Megan Rapinoe is their favorite person in the media right now, have a shirt with her face on it and think her goals in the World Cup were amazing but it’s a love that is as fleeting as a viral video.

The social fans can turn in to casual fans and the casuals to diehards if they are given a chance. If they are given a reason to go from supporting just the national team, which has been around for 30 plus years, to supporting an NWSL team that may or may not be there in five years or three years or even next year. It is easier to invest your time, your social media posts, or money for a jersey or a ticket into a player like Alex Morgan or Megan Rapinoe because the USWNT isn’t going anywhere. The national team might break your heart, but it isn’t being disbanded anytime soon. And fans can shift between all of these stages from time to time. Pushed away by overzealous diehards or pulled in by the ones that understand how to speak their language so to speak. There are other types of fans, shades that bleed from one color to another like the lines between red and orange and yellow bleed together on a canvas.

Right now women’s soccer in the US, and really around the world, is at a crossroads in terms of how they draw people in. Not just the diehard fans and not just the social fans, but how do teams draw in the mass of casual fans and get them to give a damn long term? How do you turn someone who has a general idea of what is going on and make them passionate a year from now, five years from now when there are so many others sports and so much other entertainment in the world?

That is the billion dollar question, right? The men’s side has figured that out by and large around the world. They have multi billion dollar clubs. They have transfer fees that make MLB contracts look like chump change. They have full stadiums and professional accommodations.

The answer to all of this might be as simple as investment spent to raise the tides and to lift all the boats up. It likely is more complex than that as oversight and accountability have to come into play after all the negligence we’ve seen over the years has rotted the core in places.

The biggest asset that women’s soccer has right now is the players who play the sport, but the second is the fans who will be there in one form or another as long as there are balls to kick into nets and defenders trying their hardest to stop that from happening. The fans have shown in one form or another they will show up, show out, retweet, talk about and be there when the Yanks come marching in or the Riveters march to Providence Park. Given half of a half of a chance they always will.

Christen Press and Rose Lavelle Pull Up a Barstool and That’s Not Great

Posted on by Backline Soccer

Women’s soccer is funny sometimes. There are funny things that happen in and around women’s soccer (or women’s sport in general) that are odd when you compare them to men’s sports.

Women are often scrutinized for the things they chose to do on a level that is comical at best and deeply unfair at worst. Megan Rapinoe swears and we must think of the children, but if LeBron James then he’s just being passionate. Alex Morgan sips tea after scoring it is arrogant, but look at any NFL game and you will see nut grabbing and planned celebrations nearly every touchdown or sack. 

Things like Rapinoe and Morgan celebrating publicly and proudly are harmless. Even if we must think of the children, and we so often are told we must in women’s sports, at the end of the day these players have no more a duty to think of the children as Charles Barkley did in 1993. If little Timmy or Susie hears Rapinoe drop an F-Bomb or see’s Morgan sipping some tea, they will be fine. I promise you a life of crime does not lay ahead for anyone seeing what Rapinoe and Morgan have done.

It is a problem though when a women’s soccer player does a gross thing. Because we’re so often called on to defend the silly or the meaningless or to think of the children when they do step over the line we don’t always want to point out the gross thing they have done.  The same people who would, rightly, defend Morgan’s celebration or Rapinoe swearing may not know how to react. The problem is in the case of the gross things, they shouldn’t defend the players even if it feels like the Rapinoe and the Morgan thing all over again. 

And that brings us to Christen Press and Rose Lavelle.

Christen Press promoted Barstools brand during the parade in New York City during her Instagram takeover just days after they won it all sends people to the Barstool social media. People who had either never heard of the company or who wouldn’t have followed them before did. It grew their brand.

Rose Lavelle went on their Pardon My Take podcast to “talk about the World Cup, how soccer works, Cincinnati and scoring mad goals” according to Barstool. People who were searching for Lavelle or the USWNT or anything to do with the World Cup may have found and tuned in. They may go back for more episodes. 

The debate about the differences in impact of taking over an Instagram for an hour and being on an episode of a podcast is not one I am interested in having. If you want to say taking over an Instagram is worse, sure, go for it. If you want to say being on a podcast and interacting directly with people who work for the site is worse, fine by me. In the end both are bad. Because Barstool Sports is terrible. And don’t take my word for how bad Barstool Sports is, check out Stop Enabling Barstool’s Shit and Inside Barstool Sports’ Culture of Online Hate: ‘They Treat Sexual Harassment and Cyberbullying as a Game’ if you want a taste of why they are terrible. 

We put more pressure on the USWNT to get things right more than most other female athletes and most female athletes have pressure on them to get things right more than most male athletes. We expect more from them in terms of being role models and giving the perfect quote, the perfect sound bite, the perfect performance in their public lives. It’s not fair to them. It is 100% not fair at all.But they also shouldn’t get passes when they do gross stuff because some men do it too. 

Press and Lavelle working with Barstool Sports is very bad, horrible, no good. There is no way to spin it in a way that it becomes somehow neutral, let alone positive. I want to be clear that we don’t fully know if it was Christen Press or her team or Rose Lavelle or hers that reached out to Barstool or if Barstool reached out to them. USWNT Press Officer On Christen Press’s Barstool Sports Partnership: “Something Seems Amiss!” shows how unclear it all is. But at the end of the day even if the players knew nothing about the site they were connection themselves with, their names are now linked when someone Googles their name. At the end of the day, team or player, the player’s name is the one that is out there.

Women and women of color have a lot of pressure put on them that isn’t fair. But I do not think it is unreasonable to expect them to not work with and promote sites that actively harm and harass others while wrapping what they do is a goof and just for fun. I get the urge from their fans to defend them the way they often have to defend female athletes just being themselves. But working with companies that don’t gleefully harass women isn’t unfair pressure, it is basic respect. 

I’m disappointed in Press and Lavelle as someone who supports the USWNT and who believes in the calls for equal pay and equality the team has been pushing for years at this point. I don’t expect everyone on the team to be Rapinoe or Ali Krieger when it comes to politics but I do expect more than endorsement of sites like Barstool Sports. 

I really do hope they figure out what they did sucks, honestly tell us they are sorry and they do things that suck less in the future. 

Carli Lloyd Unsure of Future

Posted on by Backline Soccer

Amidst the celebration of yet another World Cup victory, US Women’s National team star Carli Lloyd may have given some insight into a potential retirement. She still feels like she is at the top of her game, but sounded displeased by the view of her as being more of a substitute. 

“It’s been a really tough couple of years,” said Lloyd. “It’s not based on my ability and for whatever reasons, coaches made the decision. I tried to put up a good case (to play).”

Lloyd did play a role in the 2019 World Cup victory but it was as a super-substitute off the bench. In all, the former FIFA Women’s Player of the Year only started in one game, a group stage meeting against Chile. She scored twice in that game but was unable to crack the starting line-up for the remainder of the tournament.

Overall, the Women’s National team was stacked with talent unlike ever before. Lloyd’s contributions are certainly not undervalued, but head coach Jill Ellis may not see her as a long term part of the team and played her in that way over the course of this tournament.

Lloyd turns 37 next week but hasn’t shown a significant dip in production. Her efforts with Sky Blue can be attributed to the team’s on and off-field issues but she has produced on the international stage. She has scored three goals despite not being a starter thus far in 2019 and does have hopes of playing in the Olympics next year.

 “I’m going to go home, I’m going to kind of let the emotions die down a little bit, speak to my husband and we’ll go from there.”

While her future may be in doubt, she did express her happiness about the team’s performance in France. She has been a part of two World Cup teams and been a major face for women’s soccer.

“The goal was winning,” said Lloyd. “I’m really proud of this team and proud to be on this roster of 23 players to win another World Cup.”

USA v. Netherlands: Four Questions for the Final

Posted on by Backline Soccer

The big one is finally here. The United States enter this match on an 11-game winning streak in the competition, which goes all the way back to the group stage in 2015. One more win here and they will win their fourth World Cup.

According to the bookies, that is overwhelmingly likely, with the US favored at around 80% to take home the title. I’m inclined to agree. But 80% isn’t 100%, so let’s talk through a couple of the key variables worth considering while we wait.

Will Megan Rapinoe and Rose Lavelle start?

Rapinoe was held back from the semifinal with a hamstring strain, while Lavelle had to be removed after an hour with the same injury. Both have been training in the run-up to the final, and are at least theoretically available. But will they be 100%? And if they’re anything less than that, will they start anyway?

In the case of Rapinoe, the US has a more-than-able backup in Christen Press. In fact, as I argued after the England match, Press is almost certainly a better option right now, even setting aside injury concerns. It would be hard to sit Rapinoe—who has been the biggest story of the tournament. But the reality is that, goals notwithstanding, she hasn’t actually played that well. And Press is in the best form of her life.

With Lavelle, there isn’t an obvious replacement, with no other players on the US roster really capable of creating the same way that she can (Crystal Dunn is the exception here, but that ship has long since sailed). However, it’s not clear that the US needs a player in Lavelle’s mold in this game. The more muscular and mobile trio of Ertz, Horan, and Mewis might be best-suited for throttling the Dutch midfield, and ensuring the US keeps a tight hold on the game.

In both cases, the US has a range of options. Even with no injury concerns, you could make a decent case for resting them both. And with the injuries, the argument gets stronger. But, in general, Jill Ellis has a preference for sticking with her best XI, so I certainly wouldn’t be surprised if both Rapinoe and Lavelle start.

Will the US play sloppy, and can the Dutch make them pay?

The US have won every game so far, but have also been pretty sloppy in the process. A mistake from Alyssa Naeher almost gifted Chile a goal. Some extremely questionable defending against Sweden could easily have conceded a goal. Spain, France, and England all had excellent chances to find an equalizer or winner in their knockout matches.

In every case, the US has had enough to hold off the opposition. But these have not been blowouts. They’ve generally been lucky that their defensive breakdowns have been relatively contained. A big part of that has been the oft-maligned Abby Dahlkemper, who is quietly having her best run of games in a national team kit. But the US have been playing with fire. And, at least in theory, this Dutch team has the potential to ruthlessly exploit the kind of gaps that the US has been allowing.

Will the 2017 Netherlands ever show up?   

In 2017, the Dutch were a revelation. They raced to a European title, obliterating every opponent that came their way. They were particularly devastating against teams that expected to control the game. Given space to work, the wide attackers were relentless. Opponents simply couldn’t cope with the quickness of play and repeatedly found themselves overwhelmed.

Over the next two years, though, the Dutch showed relatively little of that prowess. They struggled to qualify, having to go through the playoffs. And even here, with six wins out of six, they have never really turned up. They’ve made the final, which is a huge accomplishment, but compare the route the US have taken (Spain, France, England) to the Netherlands path (Japan, Italy, Sweden). The gap is enormous. And then remember that the Dutch were thoroughly outplayed by Japan and only managed to scrape through on a 2019 Handball Special.

Most of the problem has come from the frontline: Lieke Martens has been bad, and Shanice van de Sanden has been worse. Vivianne Miedema has done just enough to keep them going, but has only really had one excellent game (against Cameroon). The substitutes have played well in limited minutes, but shown little when given more of a chance to make their mark.

The midfield haven’t controlled games to the extent they would like, but have done enough to keep them in every match. The problem there is that Spitse, Van de Donk, and Groenen have played 1651 of a possible 1710 minutes over their first six games. They’ll need to get 100% performances from all three in this match, and it’s hard to see that happening under the hot midday sun, on no rest, at the end of a long tournament.

So on the evidence of the last month, this game should be a fairly easy win for the US. But we know what the Dutch are theoretically capable of producing. If they can put it all back together, this could be a lot tougher for the US than expected. I wouldn’t bet on it, but you certainly can’t rule it out entirely.

How do you mime eating a stroopwafel?

I certainly don’t know, but we’ll probably get to find out!

Rapinoe on WC Pay Disparity: “Certainly Not Fair”

Posted on by Backline Soccer

US Women’s World Cup star Megan Rapinoe did not hold back on Saturday when she fielded questions about the increase in World Cup prize pay disparity that is set to happen between the men’s and women’s game in 2021. 

FIFA President Gianni Infantino wants to double the prize money for the top international competition in women’s soccer to $60 million. While on the outside this may look like progress, the men’s World Cup scheduled for Qatar in two years will see an increase in prize money to $440 million. The disparity will increase by an astounding $380 million. 

“It certainly is not fair,” said Rapinoe when asked by the press. “We should double it now and then use that number to double it or quadruple it for the next time.”

Rapinoe has been on the front line during this World Cup and in recent years as the women’s game looks for major support from big money backers and federations. She has vocally criticized FIFA and US Soccer for their shortcomings both domestically and internationally. The money issue is one that brings many of the complaints to the forefront.

“That is what I mean when we talk about: ‘Do we feel respected?’ Earlier in the year, a quote came out where I said FIFA doesn’t care about the women’s game. That’s what I mean. If you really care about each game in the same way, are you letting the gap grow.”

In recent years the fight for support from FIFA has been a strain. Just four years ago the fight to have games played on actual grass was an issue that the men’s World Cup would never need to concern themselves with. Now, it is a fight for respect when ratings, ticket sales and eyeballs have increased far more on the US Women’s team than with the men.

“I’m not saying that the prize money is $450 million this time or next time around. I understand that for a lot of different reasons the men’s game, financially, is far more advanced than the women’s game but if you really care, you’re letting the gap grow?”

Thus far the off-the-field battle for their place in the sporting world hasn’t affected the on-the-field product. Tomorrow the US Women’s National Team goes for their fourth World Cup championship and their second in a row against Netherlands. Thus far they have impressively dispatched Spain, France and England in the knockout stages and are heavy favorites against the Netherlands.